Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le cinema quebecois apparait a la fois comme un puissant revelateur des tendances parcourant la societe, et comme un outil de transformation. Pendant la Revolution tranquille, les Quebecois connaissent des transformations majeures des institutions sociales, et prennent conscience du changement des mentalites et de la conscience ; ils commencent a penser profondement leur identite collective quebecoise. Pendant cette periode s'etendant environ de 1958 a 1967, les cineastes quebecois representent donc, dans leur imaginaire filmique, ce mouvement social, mental ainsi qu'une remise en question de l'identite. Nous abordons d'abord, dans le premier chapitre, le cinema reflechissant sur la mise en proces du passe duplessiste et religieux, provoquant une remise en question des fondements identitaires traditionnels, et recherchant une essence quebecoise qu'on trouve, par exemple, chez Pierre Perrault. Dans le deuxieme chapitre, nous traitons du recit hegemonique du manque identitaire, c'est-a-dire la representation melancolique de l'identite quebecoise, par exemple dans les films de Claude Jutra et de Gilles Groulx. Le troisieme chapitre nous amene a une exploration de l'identitaire quebecois dans la pluralite de ses filiations, dans ses aspects demultiplies, qui s'eloigne de la quete d'une essence ou de l'exposition narrative d'une representation melancolique de l'identite ; il s'agit du cinema de Gilles Carle. Finalement, nous concluons qu'il existe en effet, au Quebec, un lien etroit entre le cinema et l'identite collective quebecoise, surtout pendant la Revolution tranquille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".