MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159123497 · doi:10.1039/c2ja10249h

Some speculations on the mechanisms of photochemical vapor generation

2011· article· en· W2159123497 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormic acidChemistryPhotochemistryMetalAcetic acidMercury (programming language)Environmental chemistryOrganic chemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Possible mechanisms are advanced to account for a number of observations/phenomena associated with the production of volatile metal species arising from photochemical vapor generation in acetic and formic acid media. These systems include mercury, iodine, selenium, iron and nickel as test cases which generate cold vapor, hydrides, methylated and carbonylated species. A model, based on the photochemical generation of free radicals involving ligand to metal charge transfer reductions and oxidations, is consistent with the majority of experimental data, including the identity of the resultant species and the impact of external parameters. This mechanistic framework will hopefully serve to enhance understanding of the technique so as to elicit enhanced performance through development of improved hardware and minimization/control of interferences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it