MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159131811 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v63i3.919

Probable Topiramate-Induced Hemiparesis

2010· article· en· W2159131811 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Joel Lamoure, Jessica Stovel, Praful Chandarana

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopiramateHemiparesisMedicineEpilepsySurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1It is also indicated for migraine prophylaxis in adults. 1,2 An off-label use of topiramate is as a mood stabilizer (with no associated weight gain) in rapid-cycling and mixed bipolar episodes. 3-7 The mechanisms of action of topiramate suggest a broad spectrum of anticonvulsant activity, including blockade of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, increase in inhibitory transmission via enhancement of -aminobutyric acid‐stimulated chloride currents, decrease in excitatory transmission via blockade of the adenosine monophosphate-kainate subtype of the glutamate receptor, and weak inhibition of carbonic anhydrase. 8-11 Despite the benefits of topiramate as listed above, includ ing weight neutrality, patients are still prone to discontinue their medications. This problem is highly prevalent among patients with mental health conditions, most notably schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. In particular, patients may abruptly discontinue their antiepileptic medications secondary to experiencing adverse effects, even if they have been made aware of the poten tial for such adverse effects through education provided by a pharmacist. Prescribers and other health care providers must be aware of potential adverse effects that may arise with the commencment and maintenance of antiepileptic therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207