MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159177593 · doi:10.1086/593947

Specification Seeking: How Product Specifications Influence Consumer Preference

2008· article· en· W2159177593 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher K. Hsee, Yang Yang, Yangjie Gu, Jie Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Consumer Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsBooth University College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpurious relationshipPreferenceProduct (mathematics)Test (biology)AdvertisingComputer scienceMarketingMicroeconomicsEconomicsBusinessMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Specification Seeking: How Product Specifications Influence Consumer Preference Get access Christopher K. Hsee, Christopher K. Hsee Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Yang Yang, Yang Yang Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Yangjie Gu, Yangjie Gu Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Jie Chen Jie Chen Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 35, Issue 6, April 2009, Pages 952–966, https://doi.org/10.1086/593947 Published: 21 October 2008

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.577
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.082 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Consumer ResearchSame topicBehavioral Health and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207