MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159180131

Osteopontin (OPN) expression in thyroid carcinoma.

2010· article· en· W2159180131 on OpenAlexaff
Juliane Briese, Sonia Cheng, Shereen Ezzat, Wei Liu, Daniel A. Winer, Christoph Wagener, Ana‐Maria Bamberger, L. Sylvia

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteopontinImmunohistochemistryTissue microarrayPathologyThyroidThyroid carcinomaThyroid cancerCarcinomaBlotMedicineCancerCell adhesion moleculeCancer researchBiologyInternal medicineGeneImmunology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteopontin (OPN) and its interacting partner CEA-cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM1) mediate similar biological functions and have been expressed in several types of cancer. Here we investigated the prognostic significance of OPN in thyroid tumours and correlated our findings with the expression of CEACAM1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 297 human thyroid samples were collected in a tissue microarray and as fresh frozen samples to perform immunohistochemistry and western blotting for OPN and to compare these data with our previously published data on CEACAM1 expression. RESULTS: Nearly all normal samples were negative for OPN. Some thyroid adenomas were weakly OPN positive whereas many carcinomas were strongly positive. In contrast to CEACAM1, which was preferentially expressed in metastatic papillary carcinomas, no associations were found between OPN expression and patient age, gender and tumour size. CONCLUSION: These results may have future implications for the diagnosis and management of patients with thyroid cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207