MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159205978 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2014.2302298

SIP Flooding Attack Detection with a Multi-Dimensional Sketch Design

2014· article· en· W2159205978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDenial-of-service attackSession Initiation ProtocolFlooding (psychology)Computer networkSketchInternet trafficThe InternetServerComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The session initiation protocol (SIP) is widely used for controlling multimedia communication sessions over the Internet Protocol (IP). Effectively detecting a flooding attack to the SIP proxy server is critical to ensure robust multimedia communications over the Internet. The existing flooding detection schemes are inefficient in detecting low-rate flooding from dynamic background traffic, or may even totally fail when flooding is launched in a multi-attribute manner by simultaneously manipulating different types of SIP messages. In this paper, we develop an online detection scheme for SIP flooding attacks, by integrating a novel three-dimensional sketch design with the Hellinger distance (HD) detection technique. In our sketch design, each SIP attribute is associated with a two-dimensional sketch hash table, which summarizes the incoming SIP messages into a probability distribution over the sketch table. The evolution of the probability distribution can then be monitored through HD analysis for flooding attack detection. Our three-dimensional design offers the benefit of high detection accuracy even for low-rate flooding, robust performance under multi-attribute flooding, and the capability of selectively discarding the offending SIP messages to prevent the attacks from bringing damages to the network. Furthermore, we design a scheme to control the distribution of the normal traffic over the sketch. Such a design ensures our detection scheme's effectiveness even under the severe distributed denial of service (DDoS) scenario, where attackers can flood over all the sketch table entries. In this paper, we not only theoretically analyze the performance of the proposed detection techniques, but also resort to extensive computer simulations to thoroughly examine the performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it