Reduced recombination associated with the production of aneuploid sperm in an infertile man: a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies using gene-linkage analysis have suggested that abnormal recombination during meiosis may lead to the production of aneuploid gametes; however, there is little direct evidence of a link between the two in human males. We analysed spermatocytes in the pachytene stage from a man with extremely high aneuploidy rates in his sperm. Testicular tissue specimens of the infertile man and two vasectomy reversals were processed with immuofluorescent techniques to visualize synaptonemal complex and recombination foci and fluorescent in situ hybridization on spermatocytes and sperm with probes for chromosomes 13, 21, 18, X and Y. We observed no recombination between sex chromosomes in the infertile man, while in two controls, we observed recombination rates of 79.3 and 81.0% between the sex chromosomes. This was associated with a total sex aneuploidy rate of 41.61% in testicular sperm of the infertile man (0.44 and 0.62% in two controls). Recombination on chromosome 21 was reduced in the infertile man, with 10.62% of spermatocytes showing no recombination (0 and 1.67% in two controls), as well as chromosome 13, with 53.98% having < or =1 recombination foci (22.05 and 21.67% in two controls). This was associated with increased aneuploidy for those chromosomes. Chromosome 18 aneuploidy was slightly increased, although there was no apparent decrease in recombination. These results provide the first evidence of both recombination and non-disjunction abnormalities in the same individual. This is also the only reported case of an infertile man who shows no recombination between the sex chromosomes, despite the formation of the sex body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".