MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2159215320 · doi:10.1109/igarss.1991.577664

Processing Of Remotely Sensed Data To Derive Useful Input Data For The Hydrotel Hydrological Model

2005· article· en· W2159215320 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Fortin, Monique Bernier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNOAA Research
KeywordsEvapotranspirationWatershedTerrainComputer scienceSoftwareDigital elevation modelLand coverModular designHydrological modellingDrainage networkRemote sensingHydrology (agriculture)Data miningEnvironmental scienceDrainage basinLand useGeologyCartographyMachine learningCivil engineeringGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new hydrological model, called HYDROTEL, has been developed recently [4,5]. Characterized by a modular structure and the ability to simulate spatially distributed processes, this model is able to make good use of remotely sensed (R.S.) data and digital terrain models. In practice, R.S. data are processed by IMATEL, a complementary software. In this paper, the emphasis is made on the transformation of R.S. data into useful informations for HYDROTEL, with actual or future algorithms integrated into our software package or available elsewhere. In particular, R.S. data are already, or may be, used for the estimation of watershed characteristics (topography, drainage network, river reaches, lake area, land-use and soil types) as well as for the estimation of meteorological variables (liquid or solid precipitations, characteristics of the snow cover and actual evapotranspiration).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→