MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159217527 · doi:10.1080/13880200701729745

Characterization of Two<i>O</i>.-Methyltransferase-like Genes in Barley and Maize

2008· article· en· W2159217527 on OpenAlexafffund
Jian‐Min Zhou, Yukiharu Fukushi, Eckhard Wollenweber, Ragai K. Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmaceutical Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsTricinPoaceaeO-methyltransferaseGeneNutraceuticalBiologyHordeum vulgareCommon wheatBotanyBiochemistryMethyltransferaseFlavonoid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tricin (3′,5′-dimethoxy-5,7,4′-trihydroxyflavone) is a characteristic flavone constituent of cereal grain plants that is credited for a variety of potential health benefits to humans. We have characterized the flavone-specific O.-methyltransferase genes of barley (Hordem vulgare. L., Gramineae), HvOMT1,. and maize (Zea mays. L., Gramineae), ZmOMT1., whose gene products use the flavone tricetin (5,7,3′,4′,5′-pentahydroxyflavone) as the preferred substrate and give rise to its 3′,5′-dimethyl derivative, tricin, as the major product. The fact that homologous enzymes catalyze the same reaction also in wheat and rice suggests the existence in cereal grain plants of a flavone-specific O.-methyltransferase multigene family. The natural occurrence of tricin in most monocot species implies the widespread occurrence of this gene family. The pharmacological significance of tricin as a naturally occurring constituent with a potential use as a nutraceutical, and the application of metabolic engineering methods to obtain tricin-enriched cereal grain products, are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmaceutical BiologySame topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207