MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159331986 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2004.224.01.13

Geometric and kinematic analysis of a transpression terrane boundary: Minas fault system, Nova Scotia, Canada

2004· article· en· W2159331986 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth MacInnes, Joseph Clancy White

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaTranspressionTerraneGeologyFault (geology)Boundary (topology)SeismologyGeodesyOceanographyMathematicsTectonicsSinistral and dextral

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Minas fault system is an ENE-WSW trending transpressional boundary between the Appalachian Meguma and Avalon tectono-stratigraphic terranes of Nova Scotia, Canada. Along this boundary there is large-scale partitioning of deformation into distinct external (contractional) and internal (shear) zones. With the increase in strain from external to internal zones there is progressive localization of deformation, culminating in the discrete shear band domain. Deformation has produced materially, temporally and spatially distinct folds and faults throughout the fault system history. Ductile structures are generally composite features derived from multiple transposition of pre-existing layers. The partitioning of deformation found amongst fault rock units can in turn be associated with contrasting deformation micromechanisms. The distinctive variation in mechanical response and microstructures provides an insight into the role of localization, partitioning and distribution of deformation. Kinematic analysis has demonstrated that the Minas fault system segment examined here is a thinning deformation zone, in which strain is accommodated within progressively narrower volumes of rock. Deformation can be summarized as a broad, initially diffuse zone of triclinic transpression that has evolved, with the accumulation of finite strain, into zones of distinct structural style and variation in finite strain. It is not possible to demarcate ‘deformed shear zone’ and ‘undeformed host rocks’. Instead, the Minas fault system is described in terms of discontinuous transitions in finite strain and deformation style within a large scale movement picture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207