MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159334296 · doi:10.1080/15376494.2012.677102

The Effect of Displacement Field on Bending, Buckling, and Vibration of Cross-Ply Circular Cylindrical Shells

2012· article· en· W2159334296 on OpenAlexaff
Farjad Shadmehri, Suong V. Hoa, Mehdi Hojjati

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBucklingDisplacement fieldBoundary value problemVibrationBendingOrdinary differential equationLaminationDisplacement (psychology)RADIUSHamilton's principleMathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisStructural engineeringMechanicsMaterials scienceDifferential equationPhysicsFinite element methodComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of assumed displacement field is investigated on the bending, buckling, and natural frequencies of cross-ply circular cylindrical shells using first-order shear deformation theory through an analytical solution. Linear strain-displacement relation is assumed. The governing equations are derived from Hamilton's principle. Assuming Levy-type solution, the governing equations are then converted to ordinary differential equations and changed to state-space form introducing ten unknown variables and solved for displacements. Different lamination sequences, including symmetric and asymmetric laminate, are studied and compared. The effect of various boundary conditions (i.e., clamped, simply supported, and free edge), radius-to-thickness, and radius-to-length ratio on the displacement of mid-surface is investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanics of Advanced Materials and StructuresSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207