Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare full binary toxin loci (CDTloc) sequences from a collection of Clostridium difficile isolates in an effort to further understand the regulation of the binary toxin (CdtAB) and its putative regulator (CdtR). Sequences from different ribotypes and toxinotypes were analysed phylogenetically and for polymorphisms, non-sense mutations, promoter features and signal sequences. Expression of cdtA, which was also representative of cdtB expression, was measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Several consensus promoter features and various polymorphisms were identified including a non-sense mutation identified in a ribotype 078 cdtR gene that is predicted to result in a severely truncated protein. Despite this mutation, cdtA expression was still detected by qPCR. Dendrograms based on total sequences indicated that isolates belonging to the same ribotype shared the greatest similarity within the binary toxin locus. Although cdtR is thought to be involved in regulation of cdtA expression, a cdtR non-sense mutation did not inhibit expression of cdtA, suggesting that either the truncated protein is functional or another regulator of the binary toxin exists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".