MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159414674 · doi:10.1109/tmm.2007.898937

Event Dynamics Based Temporal Registration

2007· article· en· W2159414674 on OpenAlex
Meghna Singh, Anup Basu, Mrinal Mandal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Multimedia · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTemporal resolutionEvent (particle physics)Artificial intelligenceTemporal databaseInterpolation (computer graphics)Computer visionVisualizationDynamics (music)Image registrationVolume (thermodynamics)Data miningImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temporal registration is the establishment of correspondence between two (or more) temporal frames of video sequences, or 3-D volume data. In this paper, we propose to use event dynamics, a property that is inherent to an event and is thus common to all acquisitions of the event, for both global and local temporal registration of video sequences in order to generate high temporal resolution video. We compare our approach to a widely used linear interpolation based temporal registration algorithm and demonstrate that in the case of low temporal acquisition rate, a global event dynamics based approach, such as ours, has smaller temporal registration error. We also present a unique application of our work in solving 3-D (2D + time) high temporal resolution medical data visualization problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it