MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159468381 · doi:10.1109/icccas.2008.4657843

Decision-Feedback-Equalizer for 10-Gb/s backplane transceivers for highly lossy 56-inch channels

2008· article· en· W2159468381 on OpenAlexaff
Dian-Yong Chen, Bo Wang, Bangli Liang, Dezhong Cheng, Tad Kwasniewski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackplaneIntersymbol interferenceAdaptive equalizerElectronic engineeringTransceiverAmplifierComputer scienceCMOSEqualization (audio)Filter (signal processing)Variable-gain amplifierChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringElectrical engineeringOperational amplifierTelecommunicationsComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a decision-feedback-equalizer for 10-Gb/s backplane transceivers for highly lossy channels. Forward equalization is not used in order to avoid noise enhancement. The sampling phase is optimized to achieve maximum signal-to-noise-ratio at the sampling instants. The coefficients of feedback finite-impulse-response filter and the gain of variable-gain-amplifier are obtained automatically by adaptive circuits. The vertical eye opening is almost doubled compared with a conventional decision-feedback-equalizer for a 56-inch channel with heavy loss more than -6.5 dB/GHz. The DFE is implemented in 0.13-mum IBM RF CMOS technologies. Results show an 8-tap DFE can open the highly blurred eye diagram, while a 12-tap conventional DFE can not open it. A 10-tap DFE yields a very clear eye diagram for PRBS-9 test patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207