La garde partagée en famille recomposée : conditions facilitantes et conséquences possibles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la réorganisation des relations parents-enfants après une séparation ou un divorce, plusieurs modalités de garde des enfants sont possibles. Certaines peuvent devenir plus difficiles après une recomposition familiale. L'article présente les résultats d'une recherche exploratoire auprès de parents et d'enfants utilisant la garde partagée ainsi que des conclusions d'une pratique au Service de médiation familiale en Cour supérieure. L'auteure propose huit conditions, chez les trois ou quatre adultes en cause, qui facilitent le succès de cette modalité de garde d'enfants. Elle ajoute cinq facteurs concrets habituellement associés à la réussite, et critique les énoncés de certains auteurs. Enfin, elle donne quelques conséquences possibles, en gains et en difficultés, pour les enfants et les parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".