MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159500641 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2005.1424617

A practical RAKE combining scheme for synchronous CDMA systems

2005· article· en· W2159500641 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Li, Hong‐Chuan Yang, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRake receiverRakeCode division multiple accessFadingComputer scienceMaximal-ratio combiningAlgorithmSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Synchronization (alternating current)Diversity combiningMathematicsElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider the performance of a RAKE receiver in a code division multiple access (CDMA) system employing maximal-ratio combining. A simple select and combine algorithm is introduced in which the RAKE receiver combines only the synchronization path and those resolvable paths with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) larger than a given threshold. We analyze its performance based on moment generating functions of the SNR of the combined signal. We study the cases with equal and unequal average SNR for different diversity paths. In particular, closed-form expressions for the average combined SNR and symbol error probability with the proposed RAKE receiver over block fading channels are derived. We also study the outage probability of the system and the number of channels estimated. Numerical results are given to illustrate the analytical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207