MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159505254 · doi:10.1109/icra.2011.5980064

Tightly-coupled multi robot coordination using decentralized supervisory control of Fuzzy Discrete Event Systems

2011· article· en· W2159505254 on OpenAlexaff
Awantha Jayasiri, George K. I. Mann, Raymond G. Gosine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupervisory controlAsynchronous communicationSupervisory control theoryRobotComputer scienceMobile robotTask (project management)Event (particle physics)Distributed computingFuzzy logicDecentralised systemControl engineeringFuzzy control systemControl (management)Control systemArtificial intelligenceEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we address the multi robot coordination problem of tightly-coupled task execution, using a formal decentralized supervisory control approach. A general architecture for decentralized supervisory control of Fuzzy Discrete Event Systems (FDES), which is capable of modeling asynchronous event driven systems with inherited uncertainties, is developed. This architecture is then incorporated for con trolling behavior-based mobile robots moving in unstructured environments while maintaining a fixed distance between each other, which resembles a tightly-coupled multi robot object manipulation task. The proposed approach is then successfully implemented in simulation with two mobile robots and a performance evaluation is also performed to investigate the validity of the proposed approach over the centralized and crisp Discrete Event System (DES) based approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207