MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159515241 · doi:10.1109/crv.2011.36

Local Shape Context Based Real-time Endpoint Body Part Detection and Identification from Depth Images

2011· article· en· W2159515241 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenning Li, Dana Kulić

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionShape contextContext (archaeology)Translation (biology)Point of interestPoint (geometry)Rotation (mathematics)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionIdentification (biology)Region of interestPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)MathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For many human-robot interaction applications, accurate localization of the human, and in particular the endpoints such as the head, hands and feet, is crucial. In this paper, we propose a new Local Shape Context Descriptor specifically for describing the shape features of the endpoint body parts. The descriptor is computed from edge images obtained from depth data generated by a time-of-flight sensor. The proposed descriptor encodes the distance from a reference point to the nearest edges in uniformly sampled radial directions. Based on this descriptor, a new type of interest point is defined, and a hierarchical algorithm for searching good interest points is developed. The interest points are then classified as head, feet, hands and others based on learned models. The system is computationally efficient, and capable of handling large variations in translation, rotation, scaling and deformation of the body parts. The system is tested using videos containing a variety of motions from a publicly available dataset, and is shown to be capable of detecting and identifying endpoint body parts accurately at very high speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207