MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159522233 · doi:10.1117/1.2717899

Real-time reflectance confocal microscopy: comparison of two-dimensional images and three-dimensional image stacks for detection of cervical precancer

2007· article· en· W2159522233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Optics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfocalConfocal microscopyPathologyEpithelial tissueDysplasiaMicroscopyMaterials scienceEpitheliumBiomedical engineeringOpticsMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Confocal microscopy can provide real-time, 2-D and 3-D images of the cellular morphology and tissue architecture features that pathologists use to detect precancerous lesions without the need for tissue removal, sectioning, and staining. The utility of 3-D confocal image stacks of epithelial tissue for detecting dysplasia has not yet been explored. We aim to extract morphometry and tissue architecture information from 2-D confocal reflectance images and 3-D image stacks from fresh, unstained cervical biopsies and compare their potential for detecting dysplasia. Nine biopsies are obtained from eight patients; confocal images are acquired pre- and postacetic acid at multiple epithelial depths in 1.5 mum-intervals. Postacetic acid images are processed to segment cell nuclei; after segmentation, 2-D images taken at 50 mum below the tissue surface, and the entire 3-D image stacks are processed to extract morphological and architectural features. Data are analyzed to determine which features gave the best separation between normal and high-grade cervical precancer. Most significant differences are obtained from parameters extracted from the 3-D image stacks. However, in all cases where the 2-D features were multiplicatively scaled by the depth of acquisition divided by the epithelial thickness or scaled by the scattering coefficient, the significance level is equal to or greater than the comparable feature extracted from the 3-D image stacks. A linear discriminant function previously developed to separate 19 samples of normal tissue and high-grade cervical precancer based on the nuclear-to-cytoplasm (N/C) ratio and epithelial scattering coefficient is prospectively applied to the nine biopsies examined to determine the accuracy with which it could separate normal tissue from cervical intra epithelial neoplasia (CIN) 23. For the entire data set of 28 biopsies, a sensitivity and specificity of 100% is produced using this discriminant function; the scattering coefficient provides more discriminative capacity than the N/C ratio. The success of the scaled 2-D image features has important implications for using confocal microscopy to detect precancer in the clinic. Acquisition of the epithelial thickness or scattering coefficient requires less time than 3-D image sets and little additional effort is required to gain the added information compared to 2-D images alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it