MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159542337 · doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.5.540

Satisfaction with Social Relations Buffers the Adverse Effect of (Mid–Level) Self–Critical Perfectionism in Brief Treatment for Depression

2007· article· en· W2159542337 on OpenAlex
Golan Shahar, Sidney J. Blatt, David C. Zuroff

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPerfectionism (psychology)Interpersonal communicationInterpersonal relationshipClinical psychologyVulnerability (computing)PersonalityDepression (economics)PsychotherapistSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing from object relations and interpersonal theories, we tested the hypothesis that satisfaction with social relations buffers the adverse effect of self–critical perfectionism on outcome in brief treatment for depression. Using data from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) sponsored Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Project (TDCRP), we found that the number of hours patients spent in satisfactory social relationships buffered the negative impact of pre-treatment self–critical perfectionism on therapeutic outcome, especially at mid–level self–critical perfectionism. Results confirm the interpersonal vulnerability of self–critical perfectionism, and attest to the remarkable similarity, in terms of personality and interpersonal relations, of processes occurring within and outside treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it