MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159556539 · doi:10.15366/reice2008.6.2.003

Condiciones, Procesos y Circunstancias que Permiten Avanzar Hacia la Inclusión Educativa: Retomando las Aportaciones de la Experiencia Canadiense

2016· article· es· W2159556539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueREICE Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en Educación · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesInclusion (mineral)SociologyPhilosophySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo no pretende describir la experiencia canadiense como una muestra o compendio de “buenas prácticas” o modelos a seguir, sino que trata de sustraer algunos aspectos clave que podemos retomar para reflexionar sobre la situación de la educación inclusiva en cada contexto o país. Conocer los factores clave que han posibilitado el avance hacia la inclusión en Canadá, permitirá formular nuevas preguntas sobre la forma de organizar una educación más inclusiva.Las percepciones, opiniones y experiencias de los profesionales entrevistados se integran en el texto en forma de breves relatos, así como las narraciones que ilustran situaciones, hechos y contextos observados.Las valoraciones de la autora sobre la experiencia canadiense se articulan alrededor de factores críticos o condiciones para el cambio abordados desde una perspectiva sistémica, de manera que el trabajo se estructura en torno a cuatro niveles en los que se deberían tomar decisiones para proponer, de forma coherente y convergente, políticas y prácticas inclusivas. Descriptores: Inclusión educativa, factores clave, mejora educativa, políticas educativas. Necessary Circunstances, Processes and Conditions to Move Towards Educative Inclusion: The Canada ExperienceThe purpose of this paper is not to describe the Canadian experience as a sample or compendium of “good practices” or patterns to be followed, but to extract some key elements that can be taken up again in order to reflect on the situation of inclusive education in different countries or contexts. Knowing the key factors that allowed progress towards inclusion in Canada will allow us to raise new questions about the way to organise more inclusive education.The perceptions, opinions and experiences of the interviewed professional are included in the text as brief statements and accounts that illustrate the situations, facts and contexts observed. The author’s points of view about the Canadian experience revolve around critical factors or conditions for change, which are analysed from a systemic approach.This paper is structured in four levels that should allow decisions to be made for the purpose of proposing inclusive policies and practices in a coherent and convergent way. Keywords: Inclusive education, key factors, Canada, school improvement, educational policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it