MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159593629 · doi:10.1177/1081286507083637

A Theory of the Mechanics of Two Coupled Surfaces

2008· article· en· W2159593629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlippingConstitutive equationContinuum mechanicsSlip (aerodynamics)Classical mechanicsContact mechanicsFinite element methodBoundary value problemMechanicsEquations of motionMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work the mechanics of two coupled membrane-like surfaces are considered. It will be shown that under special restrictions the finite deformation of the two coupled surfaces can be described using only five field parameters. This is accomplished by introducing a pairing between the two surfaces. The surfaces are permitted to slip with respect to each other subjected to frictional slipping constitutive law, but restricted to maintain full contact at all time. Such a model can be used to model frictional slip in woven fabrics. The weak form of the equations are formulated to be used with the finite element method. This theory furnishes equations of motion and boundary conditions which have clear physical meaning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it