MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159645202 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2007.4488634

Frequency of oscillation of a cross-coupled CMOS VCO with resistor tail biasing

2007· article· en· W2159645202 on OpenAlex
Sinisa Milicevic, Leonard MacEachern

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatorPhase noiseCMOSdBcFigure of meritResistorOscillation (cell signaling)Electrical engineeringFrequency offsetAmplitudePhysicsOffset (computer science)OptoelectronicsVoltageMaterials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a formula for predicting the frequency of oscillation of a cross-coupled voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO). The VCO was implemented in a CMOS 0.13 mum technology. The calculated frequency of operation shows a close agreement with the simulated results. The VCO operates at 10 GHz and consumes 490 muW from a IV supply. The simulated phase noise at a 1 MHz offset is -114.4 dBc/Hz resulting in a figure of merit (FOM) of -197.6 dB. The VCO can cover a 748 MHz frequency range and occupies 0.096 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of chip area. The simulated sensitivity of the frequency of operation and peak-to-peak amplitude due to temperature is 4.58 MHz/degC and 3.6 mV/degC, respectively. The sensitivity of the frequency of operation and peak-to-peak amplitude due to power supply is 1.1 GHz/V and 1.82 V/V, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it