MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159649114 · doi:10.5555/602902.602925

General models for optimum arbitrary-dimension FPGA switch box designs

2000· article· en· W2159649114 on OpenAlexaff
Hongbing Fan, Jiping Liu, Y. L. Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)Field-programmable gate arrayTopology (electrical circuits)Network topologyDimension (graph theory)MathematicsEmbedded systemComputer networkCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract–An FPGA switch box is said to be hyper-universal if it is routable for all possible surrounding multi-pin net topolo-gies satisfying the routing resource constraints. It is desirable to design hyper-universal switch boxes with the minimum number of switches. A previous work, Universal Switch Module, consid-ered such a design problem concerning-pin net routings around a single FPGA switch box. However, as most nets are multi-pin nets in practice, it is imperative to study the problem that involves multi-pin nets. In this paper, we provide a new view of global routings and formulate the most general-sided switch box de-sign problem into an optimum-partite graph design problem. Applying a powerful decomposition theorem of global routings, we prove that, for a fixed, the number of switches in an opti-mum-sided switch box with terminals on each side is, by constructing some hyper-universal switch boxes with switches. Furthermore, we obtain optimum, hyper-universal-sided and-sided switch boxes, and propose hyper-universal-sided switch boxes with less than switches, which is very close to the lower bound obtained for pure 2-pin net models in [5]. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207