MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159685805 · doi:10.7202/1069626ar

Mirror Reflections: Robert Smithson’s Dialectical Concept of Space

2020· article· fr· W2159685805 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Johannes Stückelberger

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet essai analyse le concept de l’espace dans l’oeuvre de l’artiste américain Robert Smithson (1938–73). La discussion porte principalement sur ses oeuvres avec miroirs. J’avance que Smithson a utilisé des miroirs pour en arriver à une perception « polyperspectiviste » de la réalité, laquelle correspondait à son concept dialectique de l’espace. Pour Smithson, l’espace apparaît dans la dialectique du site et du nonsite, dans l’aller et retour entre centre et périphérie, paysage naturel et industriel, réalité et fiction, histoire et temps présent, ordre et chaos. Son oeuvre avec miroirs lui a permis d’aborder ces aspects irrationnels, mystérieux et ouverts qui appartiennent à tout site et qui, en même temps, lui mérite un non-site. Smithson estimait que le site et le non-site ne sauraient être séparés, se renvoyant l’un à l’autre comme un miroir et sa réflexion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207