MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Photosynthetic performance at low temperature of<i>Bouteloua gracilis</i>Lag., a high‐altitude C<sub>4</sub>grass from the Rocky Mountains, USA

2000· article· en· W2159720220 on OpenAlex
Jarmila Pittermann, Rowan F. Sage

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Cell & Environment · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersStrong
KeywordsEcotypePhotosynthesisRuBisCOBouteloua gracilisBotanyPhosphoenolpyruvate carboxylaseBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The mechanisms controlling the photosynthetic performance of C 4 plants at low temperature were investigated using ecotypes of Bouteloua gracilis Lag. from high (3000 m) and low (1500 m) elevation sites in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado. Plants were grown in controlled‐environment cabinets at a photon flux density of 700 μ mol m −2 s −1 and day/night temperatures of 26/16 °C or 14/7 °C. The thermal response of the net CO 2 assimilation rate ( A ) was evaluated using leaf gas‐exchange analysis and activity assays of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCase) and pyruvate,orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK). In both ecotypes, a reduction in measurement temperature caused the CO 2 ‐saturated rate of photosynthesis to decline to a greater degree than the initial slope of A versus the intercellular CO 2 response, thereby reducing the photosynthetic CO 2 saturation point. As a consequence, A in normal air was CO 2 ‐saturated at sub‐optimal temperatures. Ecotypic variation was low when grown at 26/16 °C, with the major difference between the ecotypes being that the low‐elevation plants had higher A; however, the ecotypes responded differently when grown at cool temperature. At temperatures below the thermal optimum, A in high‐elevation plants grown at 14/7 °C was enhanced relative to plants grown at 26/16 °C, while A in low‐elevation plants grown at 14/7 °C was reduced compared to 26/16 °C‐grown plants. Photoinhibition at low growth temperature was minor in both ecotypes as indicated by small reductions in dark‐adapted F v / F m . In both ecotypes, the activity of Rubisco was equivalent to A below 17 °C but well in excess of A above 25 °C. Activities of PEPCase and PPDK responded to temperature in a similar proportion relative to Rubisco, and showed no evidence for dissociation that would cause them to become principal limitations at low temperature. Because of the similar temperature response of Rubisco and A , we propose that Rubisco is a major limitation on C 4 photosynthesis in B. gracilis below 17 °C. Based on these results and for theoretical reasons associated with how C 4 plants use Rubisco, we further suggest that Rubisco capacity may be a widespread limitation upon C 4 photosynthesis at low temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.140
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it