MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Photosynthetic performance at low temperature of<i>Bouteloua gracilis</i>Lag., a high‐altitude C<sub>4</sub>grass from the Rocky Mountains, USA

2000· article· en· W2159720220 on OpenAlexaff
Jarmila Pittermann, Rowan F. Sage

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Cell & Environment · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersStrong
KeywordsEcotypePhotosynthesisRuBisCOBouteloua gracilisBotanyPhosphoenolpyruvate carboxylaseBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The mechanisms controlling the photosynthetic performance of C4plants at low temperature were investigated using ecotypes ofBouteloua gracilisLag. from high (3000 m) and low (1500 m) elevation sites in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado. Plants were grown in controlled‐environment cabinets at a photon flux density of 700μmol m−2s−1and day/night temperatures of 26/16 °C or 14/7 °C. The thermal response of the net CO2assimilation rate (A) was evaluated using leaf gas‐exchange analysis and activity assays of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCase) and pyruvate,orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK). In both ecotypes, a reduction in measurement temperature caused the CO2‐saturated rate of photosynthesis to decline to a greater degree than the initial slope ofAversus the intercellular CO2response, thereby reducing the photosynthetic CO2saturation point. As a consequence,Ain normal air was CO2‐saturated at sub‐optimal temperatures. Ecotypic variation was low when grown at 26/16 °C, with the major difference between the ecotypes being that the low‐elevation plants had higherA;however, the ecotypes responded differently when grown at cool temperature. At temperatures below the thermal optimum,Ain high‐elevation plants grown at 14/7 °C was enhanced relative to plants grown at 26/16 °C, whileAin low‐elevation plants grown at 14/7 °C was reduced compared to 26/16 °C‐grown plants. Photoinhibition at low growth temperature was minor in both ecotypes as indicated by small reductions in dark‐adaptedFv/Fm. In both ecotypes, the activity of Rubisco was equivalent toAbelow 17 °C but well in excess ofAabove 25 °C. Activities of PEPCase and PPDK responded to temperature in a similar proportion relative to Rubisco, and showed no evidence for dissociation that would cause them to become principal limitations at low temperature. Because of the similar temperature response of Rubisco andA, we propose that Rubisco is a major limitation on C4photosynthesis inB. gracilisbelow 17 °C. Based on these results and for theoretical reasons associated with how C4plants use Rubisco, we further suggest that Rubisco capacity may be a widespread limitation upon C4photosynthesis at low temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.140
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Cell & EnvironmentSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207