MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hydrologic Response to Land Use and Land Cover Changes within the Context of Catchment-Scale Spatial Information

2013· article· en· W2159727088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrologic Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEvapotranspirationSurface runoffLand coverHydrology (agriculture)Land useVegetation (pathology)Drainage basinContext (archaeology)SWAT modelGrasslandSoil and Water Assessment ToolHydrological modellingPhysical geographyStreamflowGeographyClimatologyGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Laohahe River basin, located in northeastern China, was selected as a case study to quantify the magnitude of changes in land use and land cover (LULC) during the period from the 1970s to the 2010s and its quantitative effects on surface hydrology, based on hydrologic modeling of a distributed Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model and catchment-scale spatial information analyses from remotely sensed data. Land cover maps with 30-m resolution from 1979, 1989, 1999, and 2007, interpreted from Landsat images, were used to analyze LULC changes during the last decades. The observed daily hydro-meteorological data from 1970 to 2006 were divided into four periods: 1970–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, and 2000–2006. The SWAT model was utilized for each period with four LULC scenarios, which were developed by using the four LULC maps. Annual and monthly surface runoff and actual evapotranspiration (AET) were selected as important hydrologic elements to indicate the hydrologic response to LULC changes. The results revealed that distinct land cover changes occurred in the basin; the most important change was the conversion among vegetation cover classes of cropland, forest land, and grassland. Surface runoff always decreased as the LULC scenarios changed from 1976 to 2007 during all periods, but AET did not change regularly following the present LULC changes. Multiple regression equations between quantitative changes of LULC and hydrologic elements were developed. The equations indicated that the changes in three vegetation cover classes of grassland, cropland, and forest areas significantly affected hydrological elements and the increases of vegetation cover class areas all led to decreases in surface runoff and increases in AET. Moreover, given the same quantitative area change, the effects of cropland on hydrologic elements were the strongest, the effects of forest land were the second strongest, and the effects of grassland were the third. The effects of LULC changes on the seasonal distribution of hydrologic elements were also investigated. The results demonstrated that LULC changes have less influence on surface runoff and AET in nonflood seasons, but more influence in flood seasons, especially in July, August, and September, when the crops grow best. The results of this study improved the understanding of hydrologic responses to LULC changes and provided needed knowledge for agricultural decisions and the management of land use and integrated water resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it