MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Constructing the Self-concept through Culture: A Study with Indigenous and Mestizos Students from Different Educative Settings in Chiapas (Mexico)

2011· article· en· W2159739819 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisIndigenousSociologyHumanitiesPedagogyPsychologySocial psychologyPhilosophyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explored self-concept among 631 adolescents (410 mestizos and 221 indigenous) from the Intercultural University of Chiapas (331), the Autonomous University of Chiapas (150) and University of Altos de Chiapas (150). Our aim was to compare the results of the personal and social self-concept task (PSSC) between the students that participating in these three universities. We predicted, following the MMM approach of culture’s impact on self concept, that students will have different self-concepts because they participating in different educative settings. Specifically, we expected that adolescents who are members of the Intercultural University of Chiapas will score significantly higher on social categories in self-concept task than students who are members of the private University of Altos de Chiapas and Autonomous University of Chiapas. The results supported this hypothesis. We conducted an analysis of variance (ANOVA), showing significant differences in the studied groups. We suggested that proximal process is the mechanism through which culture influences individuals. Key words : Self-Concept; Indigenous; Mestizos; Individualism Versus Collectivism; Proximal Process Resume: Cette etude a explore le concept de soi chez 631 adolescents (410 metis et 221 autochtones) venant de l'Universite interculturelle du Chiapas (331), l'Universite autonome du Chiapas (150) et l'Universite d' Altos de Chiapas (150). Notre objectif etait de comparer les resultats de la tache du concept de soi personnelle et sociale (CSPC) entre les etudiants de ces trois universites. Nous avions predit, en suivant l'approche de l'impact de la culture sur le concept de soi, que les eleves ont de differentes conceptions de soi, car ils participent a de differentes institutions educatives. Plus precisement, nous avons espere que les adolescents qui sont membres de l'Universite interculturelle du Chiapas auraient des notes plus elevees en categories sociales dans la tache du concept de soi que les etudiants qui sont membres de l'Universite privee d' Altos de Chiapas et ceux de l'Universite autonome du Chiapas. Les resultats a confirme cette hypothese. Nous avons effectue une analyse de variance (Andva), ce qui monte des differences significatives dans les groupes etudies. Nous avons suggere que le processus proximal etait le mecanisme par lequel la culture influence les individus. Mots-cles: Concept De Soi ; Autochtones ; Metis ; Individualisme Contre Collectivisme ; Processus Proximal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it