The response of stonefly (Plecoptera) nymphs to seasonal increases in predation risk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to determine if predation risk accounted for the patterns of stonefly (Plecoptera) nymph abundance in the Maligne Valley watershed, Jasper National Park, Alberta. Seasonal declines in nymph density corresponded to increased use of the Maligne Lake Outlet and Lower Maligne River by harlequin ducks (Histrionicus histrionicus). Neither decline represented a shift from aperiodic to nocturnal use of surface rocks. Rather, rock use remained aperiodic throughout the season despite increases in risk. The decline that occurred in the Maligne Lake Outlet also did not represent a shift from small to large surface rocks. These results, when combined with the results of an odor experiment, suggest that nymphs tend to avoid surface rocks when in the presence of harlequin ducks. Nymph density did not decline seasonally in the Middle Maligne River, a site free of harlequin ducks but inhabited year-round by brook char (Salvelinus fontinalis) and rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss). Nymphs in this site as well as those exposed to char odor were nocturnally biased in their use of the substrate surface. Overall, predation risk appears to play a strong role in the patterns of stonefly nymph abundance in the Maligne Valley watershed, although not in the way originally expected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".