MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159799548 · doi:10.7202/1003555ar

Un portrait des députés québécois élus en 2003, 2007 et 2008

2011· article· fr· W2159799548 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Magali Paquin

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitique et Sociétés · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article dresse le profil sociodémographique des députés de l’Assemblée nationale du Québec élus lors des élections générales de 2003, 2007 et 2008. L’analyse porte sur la (non)représentativité des dirigeants politiques, leur hétérogénéité en fonction des clivages partisans et sur l’accentuation de la sélection sociale au Conseil exécutif. Il en ressort que les députés québécois ne sont pas représentatifs de la population du point de vue de leurs caractéristiques sociodémographiques, que le profil des députés de l’Action démocratique du Québec (ADQ) se démarque nettement de celui de leurs adversaires et que le processus de sélection ministériel a bénéficié à certains groupes, soit les femmes et les jeunes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitique et SociétésSame topicGender Politics and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207