Dynamique culturelle et service social des groupes. Pratique clinique en milieux multiculturels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face aux changements majeurs que connaît notre démographie, comment pouvons-nous assurer la pertinence culturelle du service social des groupes auprès des différentes populations auxquelles il s'adresse ? Le présent exposé propose une conception du service social des groupes qui tient compte du sens profond et de la nature unique de la vie dans nos milieux multiculturels. Il traite de questions relatives aux différences culturelles et à l'acculturation en termes d'impacts majeurs sur le bien-être psychologique et social des gens. L'article décrit quatre volets de la pratique du service social des groupes : le traitement et le support; l'éducation et la prévention; la défense des droits de la personne; l'accroissement du pouvoir des individus. Cette approche de l'intervention de groupe constitue une façon de repenser le service social des groupes en fonction de la croissance du multiculturalisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".