Diálogo social ou dever de reconversão? As Áreas Urbanas de Génese Ilegal (AUGI) na Área Metropolitana de Lisboa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este texto constitui um primeiro apontamento, realizado no quadro do Projecto de Investigação “Reconversão e reinserção urbana de bairros de génese ilegal”, sobre o “dever de reconversão” inscrito na Lei das AUGI (Áreas Urbanas de Génese Ilegal) de 1995, aqui analisado na perspectiva de participação cidadã e diálogo social, proposta pelo tema da revista. No primeiro ponto sintetizam‑se breves reflexões sobre o envolvimento dos proprietários e moradores no processo de reconversão dos “loteamentos clandestinos”, antes desta Lei das AUGI, e sistematizam‑se as mudanças operadas com a mesma Lei, criada em pleno período de governação neoliberal. Num segundo ponto, registam‑se algumas notas sobre o “dever de reconversão” dos (com)proprietários e o papel das Comissões de Administração Conjunta, nova figura criada pela Lei, discutindo o seu significado e impacto ao nível da participação pública e da co‑decisão na gestão do território.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".