Study on Pathogenicity Test of Meloidogyne incognita on Different Vegetable Crops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationships between the population density of Meloidogyne incognita and damage to test crop have been investigated. Symptoms were more pronounced of damage with ageing of the crop, but indicative only at population levels above that initiated damage. The nature and extent of damage caused by root-knot nematodes, M. incognita to test crop at different inoculum levels of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3,000 larvae per plant was studied, in pot culture. The influence of four initial inoculum densities of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita and plant age on root-knot disease of test crop shows significant reduction in the plant growth parameters and increase of initial inoculum densities increase in root-knots there by increasing nematode population but this increase was inversely proportional with the nematode population which was density dependent which causes competition for nutrition among the developing nematodes within available root system and also due to inability of juveniles of subsequent generation to find infection sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".