MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159898356 · doi:10.1109/ias.1997.626314

Constant charge and constant potential models for electrostatic discharge (ESD) and the human body

2002· article· en· W2159898356 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrostatic dischargeCapacitanceVoltageElectric fieldConstant (computer programming)ElectrostaticsHuman-body modelCharge (physics)Electric potentialElectric chargeWork (physics)MechanicsTime constantElectrical engineeringComputational physicsPhysicsAtomic physicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real electrostatic discharge (ESD) events are charge-driven phenomena. System capacitance coefficients and body potentials change as a charged body approaches another body; a discharge occurs when the electric field between the bodies exceeds the critical breakdown value. Test methods used to simulate ESD are voltage-driven; both air discharge and direct current injection methods are specified in terms of the potential applied to the probe of the simulator. In this work, the results of an analysis of constant charge and constant potential models for ESD involving the human body and another body are presented. The interpretation of the results provide a better understanding of ESD test methods and their use in the simulation of real ESD events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207