MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159959675 · doi:10.1063/1.4895646

An apparatus to manipulate and identify individual Ba ions from bulk liquid Xe

2014· article· en· W2159959675 on OpenAlexaff
K. Twelker, S. Kravitz, M. Montero Díez, G. Gratta, W. M. Fairbank, J. B. Albert, D. J. Auty, P. S. Barbeau, D. Beck, C. Benitez-Medina, M. Breidenbach, T. Brunner, G. F. Cao, C. Chambers, B. T. Cleveland, Minor J. Coon, A. Craycraft, T. Daniels, S. J. Daugherty, C. G. Davis, R. DeVoe, S. Delaquis, T. Didberidze, J. Dilling, M. J. Dolinski, M. Dunford, L. Fabris, J. Farine, W. Feldmeier, P. Fierlinger, D. Fudenberg, G. Giroux, R. Gornea, K. Graham, C. Hall, M. Heffner, S. Herrin, M. Hughes, X. S. Jiang, T. N. Johnson, S. Johnston, A. Karelin, L. J. Kaufman, Ryan Killick, T. Koffas, R. Krücken, A. Kuchenkov, K.S. Kumar, D. S. Leonard, François Léonard, C. Licciardi, Y. H. Lin, R. MacLellan, M. G. Marino, B. Mong, David C. Moore, A. Odian, I. Ostrovskiy, C. Ouellet, A. Piepke, A. Pocar, F. Retière, P.C. Rowson, M. P. Rozo, A. Schubert, D. Sinclair, E. Smith, V. Stekhanov, M. Tarka, T. Tolba, D. Tosi, J.-L. Vuilleumier, J. Walton, T. Walton, M. Weber, Liangjian Wen, U. Wichoski, L. Yang, Y.-R. Yen, Yumeng Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityTRIUMFLaurentian University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIonMaterials scienceXenonAtomic physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a system to transport and identify barium ions produced in liquid xenon, as part of R&D towards the second phase of a double beta decay experiment, nEXO. The goal is to identify the Ba ion resulting from an extremely rare nuclear decay of the isotope (136)Xe, hence providing a confirmation of the occurrence of the decay. This is achieved through Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy (RIS). In the test setup described here, Ba ions can be produced in liquid xenon or vacuum and collected on a clean substrate. This substrate is then removed to an analysis chamber under vacuum, where laser-induced thermal desorption and RIS are used with time-of-flight mass spectroscopy for positive identification of the barium decay product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207