Synaptic localization of neuroligin 2 in the rodent retina: Comparative study with the dystroglycan‐containing complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several recent studies have shown that neuroligin 2 (NL2), a component of the cell adhesion neurexins-neuroligins complex, is localized postsynaptically at hippocampal and other inhibitory synapses throughout the brain. Other studies have shown that components of the dystroglycan complex are also localized at a subset of inhibitory synapses and are coexpressed with NL2 in brain. These data prompted us to undertake a comparative study between the localization of NL2 and the dystroglycan complex in the rodent retina. First, we determined that NL2 mRNA is expressed both in the inner and in the outer nuclear layers. Second, we found that NL2 is localized both in the inner and in the outer synaptic plexiform layers. In the latter, the horseshoe-shaped pattern of NL2 and its extensive colocalization with RIM2, a component of the presynaptic active zone at ribbon synapses, argue that NL2 is localized presynaptically at photoreceptor terminals. Third, comparison of NL2 and the dystroglycan complex distribution patterns reveals that, despite their coexpression in the outer plexiform layer, they are spatially segregated within distinct domains of the photoreceptor terminals, where NL2 is selectively associated with the active zone and the dystroglycan complex is distally distributed in the lateral regions. Finally, we report that the dystroglycan deficiency in the mdx(3cv) mouse does not alter NL2 localization in the outer plexiform layer. These data show that the NL2- and dystroglycan-containing complexes are differentially localized in the presynaptic photoreceptor terminals and suggest that they may serve distinct functions in retina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".