MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160043577 · doi:10.1109/pesc.2004.1355418

Integration of energy storage with a doubly-fed induction machine for wind power applications

2005· article· en· W2160043577 on OpenAlexaff
Chad Abbey, G. Joós

Bibliographic record

Venue2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerEnergy storageAC powerInduction generatorTransient (computer programming)ConvertersTransient voltage suppressorControl theory (sociology)Power controlPower (physics)Electric power systemEngineeringRotor (electric)Compensation (psychology)VoltageComputer scienceElectrical engineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The doubly-fed induction machine has been shown to be a popular choice for wind power generators, due to the desirable features of variable speed operation, reduced converter size and the ability to control the real and reactive output power. For this topology, reactive power compensation can be supplied from both the supply side and rotor side converters and thus has the potential to provide voltage support. Addition of an energy storage element on the DC link can help to improve transient stability of the system as well as enable a greater level of control over the real power output. The storage element can be used to smooth the generator's power output by injecting real power under low wind conditions and storing energy during high wind conditions. The design of the proposed system and the control is presented and its feasibility is supported using its representation in EMTP-RV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551)Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207