MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160056822 · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/043033

Stability criteria for a passive electrostatic non-relativistic charged particle storage device

2009· article· en· W2160056822 on OpenAlexaff
P. R. Hammond, T J Reddish, Aaron Alderman, D R Tessier, F H Read

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Journal of Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsStorage ringCharged particleElectronStability (learning theory)Atomic physicsSpectrometerParticle (ecology)Context (archaeology)Track (disk drive)Energy (signal processing)Computational physicsOpticsIonNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The general conditions are determined for stable multiple orbits of non-relativistic charged particles in a race-track-shaped optical system. These conditions are then considered in the context of an electrostatic storage ring consisting of two 180° hemispherical deflector analysers connected by two separate sets of cylindrical lenses. The race-track configuration of this type has already been constructed and demonstrated to achieve storage of low-energy (tens of electronvolts) electrons (Tessier et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 253201). Incorporating the aberrations of the energy-dispersive electrostatic prisms is found to modify and restrict the general stability conditions. This modified formal matrix theory and the results of charged particle simulations described in this study are in excellent agreement with the observed experimental operating conditions for this electron recycling spectrometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Journal of PhysicsSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207