MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160057197 · doi:10.1109/tns.2006.874074

Image reconstruction from the Compton scattering of X-ray fan beams in thick/dense objects

2006· article· en· W2160057197 on OpenAlexaff
P.J. Arsenault, Esam M.A. Hussein

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompton scatteringIterative reconstructionNonlinear systemPhysicsInverse problemScatteringOpticsInverse scattering problemTransformation (genetics)InverseBeam (structure)AlgorithmComputational physicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceComputer visionMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image reconstruction from Compton scattering measurements results in a nonlinear inverse problem that can produce multiple solutions, particularly in deep/dense objects. In this work, the nonlinearity of the problem is mitigated by a transformation which minimizes the difference of the ratios of measurements with overlapping fields of view. Overlapping eliminates one of the competing factors in the nonlinear problem, and allows solving the inverse problem of image reconstruction beyond the one-mean-free path equivalent depth previously needed to reach a solution in scatter-only imaging. The method also enables the use of wide X-ray fan beam sources, and is numerically applied to exploit the ability of scatter imaging to acquire single-side two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) images of relatively dense objects. Examples are presented to demonstrate the method's ability to deal with noisy measurements, at various degrees of overdetermination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207