Sara Honn Qualls and Norman Abeles (Eds.). Psychology and the Aging Revolution: How We Adapt to Longer Life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Ce livre présente un ensemble de chapitres qui résument la recherche actuelle sur la psychologie du vieillissement. Les auteurs sont des chefs de file dans ce domaine et leurs écrits proviennent de conférences tenues par la American Psychological Association en 1997. Parmi les sujets abordés, on relève les défis associés à une longue vie, les théories du vieillissement neuropsychologique et cognitif, les changements de la mémoire avec l'âge, l'émotion, les relations sociales, la santé psychologique et le vieillissement, la dépression et enfin, la psychothérapie chez les aînés. Le livre convient bien à ceux qui souhaitent prendre connaissance des données les plus récentes concernant la population vieillissante des sociétés développées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".