MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160081645 · doi:10.1111/anae.12849

Ultrasound‐guided rectus sheath catheter placement

2014· letter· en· W2160081645 on OpenAlexaff
Ban C. H. Tsui, J. S. Green, Vivian Ip

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRectus sheathCatheterSurgeryEpidural spaceUmbilicus (mollusc)Inferior epigastric arteryAbdominal wallArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with interest the excellent article by Niraj et al. 1, which documented the effectiveness of continuous transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as an alternative to epidural anesthesia. We concur with their observations and have also found that TAP blocks can provide reasonable analgesia for selective major abdominal procedures when epidural anesthesia is contraindicated, or if there are other concerns about administering an epidural. Although rare, serious complications of epidurals can be potentially devastating and may result in permanent neurologic damage 2. Indeed, a recent editorial 3 suggested that the benefits of epidural analgesia are probably limited to high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. As alternatives to epidurals, we use infusion catheters in the paravertebral space (open nephrectomy and open cholecystectomy), TAP (hepatobiliary and general surgery), and rectus sheath (midline laparotomy) 4. There is limited published information regarding ultrasound-guided rectus sheath blocks, particularly in the adult population. Recently, we have adapted rectus sheath block as an alternative to epidural block for midline incisions. Using a technique described previously for single-shot rectus sheath blocks 4, a linear transducer is placed in transverse orientation at the midpoint between the umbilicus and xiphisternum and moved laterally to the lateral border of the rectus sheath (Fig. 1). A lateral approach avoids the epigastric artery. Using a previously described catheter-over-needle technique (E-Catheter, Pajunk, Germany) 5, the catheter needle is then advanced in-plane from the lateral side of the probe towards the midline to enter the lateral border of the rectus sheath. Hydrodissection will separate the rectus muscle from the posterior rectus sheath, and the catheter is advanced to lie between these two layers (Fig. 1). A second catheter is inserted on the other side. An initial bolus of 20 ml ropivacaine 0.2% is delivered through each catheter before commencing 1 ml.h−1 infusion regimens with programmed 20-ml boluses every 4 h. It is important to note that, while the rectus sheath catheter is effective at relieving somatic pain, it usually needs to be run in conjunction with a multimodal analgesia regimen (e.g. patient-controlled opioid analgesia) to control visceral pain. Alternative techniques for placement and management of rectus sheath catheters have been described 6, and familiarity with this technique provides another alternative to epidural analgesia during a time when emphatic indications for epidural catheters appear to be decreasing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesiaSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207