A Stereo Vision-Based Approach to Marker-Less Motion Capture for On-Site Kinematic Modeling of Construction Worker Tasks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marker-less motion capture has been extensively studied in recent years as a means of evaluating productivity, safety, and workplace design for manual operations on-site. These technologies are ideal for circumstances in which traditional motion capture systems are ineffective due to the need for a laboratory setting and movement-inhibiting markers or sensors. However, many marker-less motion capture systems rely on RGB-D sensors that have limited range and susceptibility to interference from sunlight and ferromagnetic radiation, making them unsuitable for modeling worker actions on construction sites. To address this issue, we propose a marker-less motion capture approach utilizing optical images and depth data obtained from stereo vision cameras. Multiple camera lenses and triangulation algorithms generate depths maps similar to those produced by RGB-D sensors, while still utilizing an optical recording process unhindered by potentially harsh construction site conditions. These data are adapted for existing kinematic modeling systems (i.e. iPiMocap Studio) for 3-D pose estimation. The experiments show that the proposed approach can provide data precision comparable to that of RGB-D-based systems with fewer operational constraints; thus, motion data can be collected where previously developed methods fail due to environmental or maneuverability restrictions. With the proposed approach, kinematic modeling of human movements can be carried out on construction sites without inhibiting the mobility of the recorded subject.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it