A Case of Cronkhite–Canada Syndrome markedly improved with mesalazine therapy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a 50‐year‐old Japanese woman with typical clinical manifestations of Cronkhite–Canada Syndrome (CCS) and possible novel treatment modality for this disease. The patient was diagnosed as CCS based on the presence of several clinical manifestations, such as a diffuse alopecia, nail deformities, hypogeusia, pigmentation of skin, and abdominal discomfort combined with diarrhea and wasting. In addition, she also had multiple polypoid lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. She was first treated with hyperalimentation and corticosteroid. While this combination therapy seemed to reduce several clinical manifestations, abdominal symptoms and diarrhea recurred with the beginning of oral nutrition. Endoscopy and histology showed that inflammatory changes remained, especially in the lower intestine. Therefore, mesalazine was started. A few days after this therapy, her clinical symptoms disappeared and the polypoid lesions in the large bowel completely resolved. It was therefore possible to restart oral nutrition. We predict that the administration of mesalazine might be one of the useful therapies for CCS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it