MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160130738 · doi:10.1111/saje.12008

Modelling Monetary Union in <scp>S</scp>outhern <scp>A</scp>frica: Welfare Evaluation for the <scp>CMA</scp> and <scp>SADC</scp>

2013· article· en· W2160130738 on OpenAlex
Xavier Debrun, Paul R. Masson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth African Journal of Economics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredibilityWelfareEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper proposes a quantitative assessment of the welfare effects arising from the C ommon M onetary A rea ( CMA ) and an array of broader groupings among S outhern A frican D evelopment C ommunity ( SADC ) countries. Model simulations suggest that ( i ) participating in the CMA benefits all members; ( ii ) joining the CMA individually is beneficial for all SADC members except A ngola, M auritius and T anzania; ( iii ) creating a symmetric CMA ‐wide monetary union with a regional central bank carries some costs in terms of foregone anti‐inflationary credibility; and ( iv ) SADC ‐wide symmetric monetary union continues to be beneficial for all except M auritius, although the gains for existing CMA members are likely to be limited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it