MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160164890 · doi:10.1154/1.1648316

Crystal structure of dicalcium chromate hydrate

2004· article· en· W2160164890 on OpenAlexaff
Cristian E. Botez, Peter W. Stephens, Oladipo Omotoso

Bibliographic record

VenuePowder Diffraction · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersState University of New YorkU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsHydrateMonoclinic crystal systemCrystallographyCrystal structureChromate conversion coatingPowder diffractionMaterials scienceRietveld refinementPolyhedronSynchrotronChemistryChromiumMetallurgyOpticsPhysicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct methods and Rietveld analysis were applied to high-resolution synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data to solve the crystal structure of dicalcium chromate hydrate (Ca 2 CrO 5 ⋅3H 2 O). The compound crystallizes in monoclinic symmetry (space group Cm, Z=2), with a=8.23575(5) Å, b=7.90302(4) Å, c=5.20331(3) Å, and β=98.0137(3)°. The structure is built from double-layers of CrO 4 tetrahedra and CaO 8 polyhedra that run parallel to the (001) plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePowder DiffractionSame topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207