The Growth of Urbanization and Environmental Instability: A Case Study in Ahvaz Metropolis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uncontrolled growth of urbanization has been exposed major quantitative and qualitative developments at the beginning of twenty-first century. Current world has been much urbanized and proportion of urban population to total population has been changing and increasing more than before and human modern civilization has been directing to urbanization and this urban growth has served natural resources in its service end. Finally, the result is damaging the ecological system and the unstable environment in cities. Accordingly, we are faced with the questions of how the capacity of cities against environmental problems is caused by urban development and the use of biological resources. These questions are as follows: what is the biological capacity in cities? Does the environment can reconstruct degradation and changing posed by the cities with this level and speed? How much is the amount of urban environmental sustainability to cope with these changes? The role of the city in environmental instability becomes more clear when we know that just about three- quarter of natural resources has been consumed one-fiftieth of the world and the rate of environmental pollution production in cities are three-fourth of the total pollution. Ahvaz metropolis has been chosen as a case of study of the related issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".