MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160180122 · doi:10.1139/p05-065

D.C. electrical and optical properties of vacuum-deposited organic semiconductor FePcCl thin films

2005· article· en· W2160180122 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Rajesh, C. S. Menon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin filmPermittivityDielectricAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Band gapSemiconductorAbsorption edgePhysicsAbsorption (acoustics)Spectral lineCapacitanceElectrodeOpticsOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sandwich and planar structures are fabricated by a vacuum deposition method using iron phthalocyanine chloride (FePcCl) as an active layer and gold (Au) as electrodes. The permittivity ε of FePcCl is determined from the dependence of capacitance on film thickness. The current density – voltage characteristics characteristics of the Au/FePcCl/Au structure at room temperature are found. Thermally generated hole concentration p0, hole mobility µp, total trap concentration Nt, and depth of the trap level are estimated. The activation energies of FePcCl films are determined from Arrhenious plots of ln σ versus 1000/T. The absorption and reflectance spectra of a FePcCl thin film deposited at room temperature are recorded in the spectral range 300–900 nm. The optical band gap of a FePcCl thin film is determined from the α2 versus hν graph. The optical constants n and k are found. The real and imaginary parts of the optical dielectric constant ε1 and ε2 are calculated. These optical parameters are plotted against photonenergy. PACS Nos.: 72.80.Le, 73., 78.20.–e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchFrench-language works237,207