Spontaneous currents in Josephson junctions between unconventional superconductors and d-wave qubits (Review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The modern physics of superconductivity can be called the physics of unconventional superconductivity. The discovery of the d-wave symmetry of the order parameter in high-temperature superconductors and the triplet superconductivity in compound Sr2RuO4 has caused a huge stream of theoretical and experimental investigations of unconventional superconductors. In this review we discuss some novel aspects of the Josephson effect which are related to the symmetry of the order parameter. The most intriguing of them is spontaneous current generation in an unconventional weak link. The example of a Josephson junction in the form of a grain boundary between two disorientated d-wave or f-wave superconductors is considered in detail. Josephson current–phase relations and the phase dependences of the spontaneous current that flows along the interface are analyzed. The spontaneous current and spontaneous phase difference are manifestations of the time-reversal symmetry (𝒯 ) breaking states in the system. We analyzed the region of appearance of 𝒯-breaking states as function of temperature and mismatch angle. A review of the basics of superconducting qubits with emphasis on specific properties of d-wave qubits is given. Recent results in the problem of decoherence in d-wave qubits, which is the major concern for any qubit realization, are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".