MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160187516 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020411

Near-IR spectroscopy of planetary nebulae precursors

2002· article· en· W2160187516 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen moleculePlanetary nebulaSpectroscopyEmission spectrumNebulaHydrogenStarsSpectral lineAbsorption spectroscopyExcitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present near-IR spectroscopy of a sample of 30 IRAS sources recently identified as late AGB stars, post-AGB stars or early PNe. The spectra obtained are centered at various wavelengths covering the molecular hydrogen 0 S(1) 2.122 μm and 1 S(1) 2.248 μm emission lines, the recombination lines of hydrogen Brγ 2.166 μm, Pfγ 3.741 μm and Brα 4.052 μm, and the CO[ 0] first overtone bandhead at 2.294 μm. As a result of these observations we have detected molecular hydrogen emission for the first time in 9 of these sources and confirmed a previous detection by Weintraub et al. ([CITE]). This increases from 4 to 13 the total number of proto-PNe detected in molecular hydrogen. In most cases, the positive detections also show emission in the recombination lines of hydrogen (with the exception of IRAS 17150-3224) indicating that the onset of molecular hydrogen emission takes place in the post-AGB phase, very shortly before the nebula becomes ionized. When the molecular hydrogen is fluorescence-excited the detection rate is found to be directly correlated with the evolutionary stage of the central star, rather than with the nebular morphology. When the temperature of the central star is hot enough, fluorescence excitation can be induced by the absorption of UV photons escaping from the rapidly evolving central post-AGB star. In contrast, shock-excited molecular hydrogen is detected only in strongly bipolar proto-PNe, sometimes even at an early stage in the post-AGB phase. Shock excitation is the consequence of the interaction of the fast post-AGB wind with the slow wind material ejected during the AGB. The strong correlation of shock-excited molecular hydrogen emission with bipolarity found confirms the result previously reported by Kastner et al. ([CITE]) in evolved PNe. However, our results show that this correlation does not exist in the case of fluorescence-excited molecular hydrogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207