A novel Hα control strategy for design of a robust dynamic routing algorithm in traffic networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper novel centralized and decentralized routing control strategies based on minimization of the worst-case queuing length are proposed. The centralized routing problem is formulated as an H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">infin</sub> optimal control problem to achieve a robust routing performance in presence of multiple and unknown fast time-varying network delays. Unlike similar previous work in the literature the delays in the queuing model are assumed to be unknown and time-varying. A Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) constraint is obtained to design a delay-dependent H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">infin</sub> controller. The physical constraints that are present in the network are then expressed as LMI feasibility conditions. Our proposed centralized routing scheme is then reformulated in a decentralized frame work. This modification yields an algorithm that obtains the "fastest route", increases the robustness against multiple unknown time-varying delays, and enhances the scalability of the algorithm to large scale traffic networks. Simulation results are presented to illustrate and demonstrate the effectiveness and capabilities of our proposed novel dynamic routing strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it